European Coalition on
Homeopathic & Anthroposophic
Medicinal Products
Following the debate: homeopathy and anthroposophic medicine
Homeopathy continues to hit the headlines in Europe and elsewhere, with more negative stories about homeopathy than usual in the media in the last few months, often based on incomplete or biased information. At the same time, in a number of countries, the homeopathic community is fighting back more openly, with active campaigns in UK, Australia, Germany and Sweden. Although the media is less inclined to cover the positive stories, in some cases the responses and campaigns are gaining traction. This month-by-month summary of recent news items includes both positive and negative stories, supported by useful background to give you the facts behind the headlines.
February
- On 15 February, 65 members of the Bulgarian Academy of Science published a call to the medical universities to remove homeopathy from the curriculum. The story was covered in the media, including in several TV debates; in general the view expressed was that the academics that signed the call against homeopathy were misinformed about the most recent research.
On 19 February, the Swedish homeopathic associations sent an
to the Swedish Royal Academy of Science, accusing it of flouting science’s own rules for impartiality and objectivity in organising an event on homeopathy at the parliament without inviting anyone with expertise to speak in favour of homeopathy. Swedish homeopathic associations have taken further initiatives to defend homeopathy with the publication of a film in Swedish, ‘The battle for the paradigm of health’, an extract of which can be found translated into
and
.
Kurzgesagt, a German YouTube channel, launched a video, ‘
Homeopathy Explained – Gentle Healing or Reckless Fraud
’, which has now reached about 3 million views.
, Dr Paul Theriault, naturopathic doctor, highlights as series of inaccuracies and false assumptions, saying, ‘This video piles falsehood upon falsehood, in an, admittedly, quite visually lovely piece, but one of no serious intellectual value, or any real accuracy.’
March
A
in BMJ Open, supported by a BMJ Open
, shows that surgeries employing general practitioners with additional training in complementary medicine prescribe fewer antibiotics; the research received widespread media coverage in
, local and
media in the UK (see
).
A
in March presented a series of false information aimed at destroying homeopathy, bringing together services from across Europe to argue in favour of cancelling homeopathy to save public money and have better levels of health care. In counterbalance, FIAMO, the biggest association of homeopaths in Italy, launched the
campaign “Italian Cities for Homeopathy”
with a national tour of the documentary “Just One Drop” to 15 Italian cities, achieving
.
There was significant coverage in UK national (The Times, BBC, The Independent,
) and specialist media (here and here) of the story that Royal London Hospital for Integrated Medicine (formerly Royal London Homeopathic Hospital) will no longer be permitted to provide National Health Service funded homeopathic or herbal medicines; patients prescribed those medicines will have to buy them privately from the hospital pharmacy or from a specialist pharmacy.
A declaration in France by 124 doctors calling on French authorities to stop recognising homeopathy diplomas as medical university degrees or qualifications sparked a national debate in the
and
printed media, on
and on TV. The
Syndicat des Médecins Libéraux
and the
Syndicat National des Médicins Homéopathes Franҫais
were quick to refute the position, arguing that medicine needs all doctors, and that the declaration seems to ignore that fact that homeopathic doctors are also trained to practice conventional medicine.
Similarly in Spain, some articles in the national media took taken a critical stance (
and
), later
too.
In Belgium, on the other hand, as reported on TV (
) and in the papers (
and
), 7 out of 10 Belgians asked for better reimbursement of CAM treatments within their health care system.
In the UK,
reported (and
) on the response from the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs to a question from UK Member of Parliament, David Tredinnick. DEFRA confirmed it did not have any evidence to show that homeopathic vets were a risk to animal welfare; this question was part of an ongoing campaign and debate, sparked off in November by the
Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons’ call
to ban homeopathic prescriptions for animals (see ECHAMP News 13 February). The
campaign by pet owners, farmers and animal therapists
has included a public march calling for the retraction of the statement. David Tredinnick MP followed this up by securing a
Parliamentary debate on the topic of homeopathy in veterinary medicine
in May, arguing in favour of the use of homeopathy to combat overuse of antibiotics in farming.
Further support for homeopathy is found in Germany, where the boss of a major German Health insurance
defends freedom of decision of patients
who choose homeopathy for their health care.
April
On 12 April, the first item in the daily health news briefing from
for EU civil servants and politicians marked Homeopathy Awareness Week with a positive message from Dr Jaume Costa, General Secretary of European Committee for Homeopathy.
A
study in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
published in UK on 18 April argued that doctors prescribing homeopathy rate lower in terms of best prescribing quality scores; widespread
(and
,
and
) associated homeopathic prescribing with ‘bad doctors’. The
Faculty of Homeopathy argues that the study confuses rather than clarifies
the prescribing performance of GP practices where homeopathy is used to treat patients. It says ‘The media coverage of this study has been based on a short, misleading press release issued before the paper was published, so that it was not possible to evaluate its quality. …Anyone reading the actual paper will note that the authors conclude it is unlikely that prescribing homeopathy causes poorer performance.’
The campaign for homeopathy continued to be waged in the UK throughout April. On 25 April, a further
question by David Tredinnick MP
, this time during Prime Minister’s Question Time in House of Parliament, elicited an answer from Prime Minister Theresa May that ‘it is the responsibility of the local NHS to make decisions on the commissioning and funding of healthcare treatments and to take account of issues with safety, clinical and cost-effectiveness and the availability of suitably qualified and regulated practitioners’. The response was reported in the
and
media.
A new
was launched in April in Germany by DHU, enlisting patient support:
‘Homeopathy. Naturally. My choice!
’ Positive stories in the German media include an
(from minute 8) with Dr. Müller-Wohlfahrt giving positive support for homeopathy. On 7 May,
a debate on homeopathy in the doctors‘ publication, ÄrzteZeitung
, gave the pros and cons of homeopathy, with Prof. Dr. Med. Frank Ulrich Montgomery, President of the Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), the German medical association, speaking out in favour of homeopathy, “It is a fact that homeopathy helps many people.... I see homeopathy as a complementary medicine. It makes sense in conjunction with good medical education.”
In Germany too, the journal Der Spiegel published an
on a Cochrane
, ‘Homeopathic medicinal products for preventing and treating acute respiratory tract infections in children’, which concludes that the result of the research does not support the use of homeopathic preparations for upper respiratory infections in children; in its
, Carstens Stiftung explains the limitations of the study, while Dr Fred Ludwig
of selecting the right remedy in these situations.
On 20 April,
anthroposophic medicine was withdrawn
from the blacklist of therapies held by the Mission interministerielle de vigilance et de lute contre les derives sectaires, originally set up to fight against cults.
May
The French press
(here and here) an announcement by Health Minister Agnes Buzyn that there will be a discussion about the reimbursement of medicinal products which have not proven their effectiveness, highlighting her inclusion in this of homeopathy.
June
The
campaign in Australia has now reached over 85,000 signatures, stimulating
a series of questions on natural therapies
from the Senate Estimates Committee to the Federal Health Department; the campaign already claims a number of other successes including (May) a
for consumers with the Federal Government not acting on recommendations from the King Review to restrict and/or ban natural medicine products in pharmacies; successful private meetings with the Senior Federal Government officials; and the passing by the Federal Government of a reform package that protects traditional medicine.
to help keep pressure up for the Ombudsman challenge to the
discredited Australian report on homeopathy
.
In May, a judicial review into the NHS England consultation on the prescription of homeopathic medicines on the National Health Service took place, challenging the withdrawal of funding for homeopathic medicines on the NHS. The review was launched
by the British Homeopathic Association
(patients’ association) as part of its
campaign to save homeopathy on the NHS
. Despite the significance of this judicial review, challenging procedures and practice of NHS England,
at the time was limited (and
).
that the BHA’s brave legal bid to overturn the NHS decision on homeopathy has failed. Following the announcement, further reports appeared in the UK media (
and
and
).
In an interview in La Libération in France,
homeopathic doctor Jean-François Masson
argues strongly in favour of the real life benefits of homeopathy.